Great review James, Im a fan of Casio watches, I wear my Casio G7900 pretty much as my EDC when Im dressed casually. My only gripe with these watches is, the temp. gauge is extremely inaccurate because its sitting up against your 98 degree F body and the instruments need to be calibrated every so often ie compass and altimeter to accurately give you directional, ascent and descent readings. Wish they made models that were permanently accurate. On the positive side they are rugged, long lasting, easy to read at a glance and in my opinion the best watches for active lifestyle.
Thanks James, for this analysis. I have been enjoying looking at watches, buying some, and reading reviews of watches. This review is quite typical of the work you do, going into a watch with deep analysis, picking out the best watch of its kind and explaining why. There are hundreds of watches out there, and often it gets quite bewildering. Keep up the good work.
Nice review, James. I just have one little correction to a comment you made in your video. You mentioned that the barometric pressure recorded by the watch was relatively constant because you were in an office most of the day. I don’t think that’s true, unless you are in a sealed building with air pressure locks for the doors. Inside and outside pressure should be pretty close to the same value.
Thans for the excellent video review. Those just get better and better. I bought the top-of-the-range analog Pro Trek watch after seeing your review and I can add a comment based on my experience. The barometer (and altimeter) function is fairly accurate and works regardless of your indoors/outdoors location. A falling barometer generally indicates worse weather and a rising one is the opposite. of course, if you travel, it will vary because of your changing altitude. The altimeter is excellent for charting changes in elevation as you point out in your review, but it needs setting to your current altitude before heading out. If the barometric pressure changes because the weather changes, it will be less accurate. Even though I already have an analog Pro Trek, I feel I want this one as well!
Love the Pro-Trek series. i swear these watches will just go on and on and on (so tough and robust.) Have to admit i never actually used mine for the purpose it was designed for though! Love the layout of this review and the hi-res pics.
The Watch now a days not just a time piece but it is know for its functionality. when i was searching for my watch i came across the site call infibeam.com where there is a good collection of watches.
hi there – great review! James, I’d also like to ask; does this watch have sunrise/sunset data? Then this would be the ultimate watch – a tool for every occasion!
This was my first thought, Daniel, but I’ve been pleasantly surprised by Casio. My first G-Shock (GW5600) had that formed strap and it fit well. Then, the Twin Sensor I bought last year was even wider, and it also fit fine. Lastly, the WVA470 I just received is the only watch with a 42mm case diameter that would actually fit my 6-7/8″ wrist. The key is in the molded curved spots at the lugs of the case, on the bottom.
You state this watch has a Titanium case. Are you sure? I have found several claims that the case in resin, not Titanium. The Casio web site for this watch says Titanium band, but does not say the case is also. Could you please verify weather the case is Titanium or resin? Thanks.
James your review of this watch on YouTube was excellent and appreciate the thorough yet easy to understand communication style and messaging for all the features incorporated in this watch.
great article, I just picked up the 2000t at a great price but the 2500 is very cool. I can use the sunrise sunset data better then the tide graph, too bad they dont add both,,
hi …just bought the prg 2500 a week ago after watching your review on youtube..here its known as prg 250t-7dr tho….luv it..bought it for us 275 dollar …but couldnt utilise the atomic thing tho.lol..how much is it in the us?…regards from malaysia and thanks for the review
Paid $400 at Fashion Time in the Potomac Mills Mall in Woodbridge, Va. on Friday. Still reading and attempting to understand the instructions. Freakin’ think is way feature-rich. I may never master the altitude savings and recall, and tidal info, as I figure to probably not need ’em… no boat, and don’t climb. But otherwise, wow, what an instrument to be able to wear on a wrist.
Correct. It is not that it “doesn’t work” it is that the watch doesn’t include that feature. That’s why yours is a 250 instead of a 2500. The extra 0 and extra cost gets you the atomic synchronization. However, take comfort in the fact that the watch’s quartz movement is accurate to +/-15 s per month, and is probably even more accurate than that in practice.
I recently purchased the pro tek 2500t and I am tremendously pleased. This is my 7th casio in the triple sensor, solar models. I got the titanium bracelet and titanium case. Anything plastic or resin takes too much wear and tear. Overseas they make these with different crystals and here in America with different bracelet materials, I prefer the titanium model. In fact I would like the bezel to be titanium. Overall I rate the watch as exceptional and especially for the price. And approximately $400 USD, no other watch compares in functionality, cost and quality. I’d recommend it to any outdoor/sport enthuasists.
Good review! I really liked your comment about the Jeep Wrangler as I own one and your “right on the mark.” I’ve climbed 52 of the 14,000 ft. Peaks here in Colorado and wished I had this watch during those climbs. I could see where the data that this watch could show would have helped in in the numerous decisions that one makes in an assent and decent of a mountain with the varying weather, poorly marked trails, having a touch of altitude sickness, seeing the ridge line above you is the “true summit” and not another “false summit” and not having the adjoining topo of which your route crossed onto(the topos don’t adjust for a mountain’s location). I did these climbs with a topo and a compass without a GPS. The additional info that this watch presents would help keep the confidence level on the positive side. I’m sure you will agree that one’s confidence level is critical when you place yourself in these situations!
Good review, thank you. Curious why so many watches have barometers and altimeters (if they have one they may as well have both I guess, since they use the same sensor, ). Temperature is not worth the space. Far better to have sunrise, sunset, and moonrise and moon set. If there is a trade off, lose the barometer but keep the altimeter display, plus the illumination data. Like, what are you more likely going to want to know as you prepare to head up the mountain or set sail out of port or head into a new port, or plan most any type of operation: when there is going to be some light and when it is going to be dark somewhere and sometime, or would you prefer the current temperature, your altitude, and the barometric pressure? Of course, there is the issue of what other tools such as GPS or map you may have, but either way it does not change my preference. I have done a bit of all of the above activities, and I know what I prefer hands down. And if you want or need a GPS, just bring one along. Maybe the same for an altimeter. At the least, watches that have temperature should seriously think about having the sun and moon illumination data instead. The data set is already somewhat there given the moon phases and tide data. One last thing, I AM a Pathfinder.
I have a better idea, after taking into accont the atomic clock. The Pathfinder watches should have sunrise, sunset, moon rise, and moon set illumination data. Keep the 2500 as it is, except: The atomic clock feature seems to be least in synch with the concept of these watches. If a trade off has to be made, the atomic clock should be the first to go in order to have the illumination data. Next to go would be the thermometer, but the temperature does have a part to play for the weather prediction piece, and some other things. All the other features are what are needed, but it also needs sunrise, sunset, moon rise, moon set.
Excellent review, very useful detailed information, I just recently purchased the 2500T thinking that the case was titanium as well ( a little disappointed). The last casio I had was the PAW1200T which survived everything I threw at it. But recently, the sensor cover broke and trying to find parts for the casio is like pulling teeth. I would hate for their repair estimate to be close to the price of the watch.
Great review! But a really good review should not only talk about good aspects. I would personally suggest/recommend Casio to make their multi-functional watches smaller, thinner and lighter. Indeed, Casio has the world-leading technology in making multi-functional watches. No other brand watches can have all their functions simultaneously (compass, thermometer, barometer, altimeter, etc). But one thing we realize is that all those multi-functional watches are very very big and bulky. Even without triple sensor, standard Casio watches have larger average size compared to other brands, is it due to technology limitation? I’m not very sure. Hope as the technology develops, they can make it smaller in size over time to fit more people. Currently, those huge watches are only suitable for mountain climbers, ordinary people wearing them would feel cumbersome and lousy when moving their hands in daily life. A close inspection of the entire front side of the watch would reveal that >50% of the area is occupied by panels/buttons giving useless information. For example, who does NOT know up is North, down is South, left West and right East; the word ‘Tough Solar’ is kind of showing off, before I buy it, I know it’s solar, if Casio want to show it, engrave it on the back; a familiar user know which button is for what function, Casio may want to print it on the side so that the main LCD display can be made larger for clearer display and more solar power collection. If Casio can make it smaller, lighter and more durable, they will definitely exceed those top runners like Rolex, Omega. For example, if a Casio Pro Trek 2500T can have a diameter <40mm, thickness 10 years, kinetic battery recharger in addition to solar, I would definitely prefer it than any Rolex/Omega. I’m sure some people will think the other way, but as time goes by, Casio will eventually win out. Remember, the most elegant device of any kind usually have lightest weight, smallest size, most functions and greatest durability.
I recently bought one. It’s temperature sensor is terrible. Firstly its on the top left meaning if, as most do , you wear it on your left wrist then the temperature it’s measuring is “inside the shirt” temperature. Even When I transferred it to the right writs and rolled up my sleeve in -3 degrees it still said it was 12 degrees C!
Have you tried calibrating the temperature sensor? Also, in all fairness, I don’t think one can blame the watch for measuring a higher temperature while wearing it – any thermometer would be affected by your body temperature if you tied it to your arm.
Hi James, good review. I’m a huge Casio fan, currently wearing a PRG-130 and I’ve just ordered a 2500T. However, I wish Casio would address what I consider a major shortcoming in many of their watches: practically inaudible alarms (and I’m not the only one complaining about this).
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Avesta Hojabrzadeh
Great review James, Im a fan of Casio watches, I wear my Casio G7900 pretty much as my EDC when Im dressed casually. My only gripe with these watches is, the temp. gauge is extremely inaccurate because its sitting up against your 98 degree F body and the instruments need to be calibrated every so often ie compass and altimeter to accurately give you directional, ascent and descent readings. Wish they made models that were permanently accurate. On the positive side they are rugged, long lasting, easy to read at a glance and in my opinion the best watches for active lifestyle.
dirkpitt73
Nice review, thanks! Is Casio bringing the ProTrek branding to the US? It’s been Pathfinder for as long as I can remember.
Pauldamon
Thanks James, for this analysis. I have been enjoying looking at watches,
buying some, and reading reviews of watches. This review is quite typical
of the work you do, going into a watch with deep analysis, picking out
the best watch of its kind and explaining why. There are hundreds of watches
out there, and often it gets quite bewildering. Keep up the good work.
James Stacey
Thanks! We do what we can.
Suvietis
Thanks for great review and perfect hi-res images.
James Stacey
Thanks so much for reading, glad you liked it.
Jim
Nice review, James. I just have one little correction to a comment you made in your video. You mentioned that the barometric pressure recorded by the watch was relatively constant because you were in an office most of the day. I don’t think that’s true, unless you are in a sealed building with air pressure locks for the doors. Inside and outside pressure should be pretty close to the same value.
Pete
Thans for the excellent video review. Those just get better and better. I bought the top-of-the-range analog Pro Trek watch after seeing your review and I can add a comment based on my experience. The barometer (and altimeter) function is fairly accurate and works regardless of your indoors/outdoors location. A falling barometer generally indicates worse weather and a rising one is the opposite. of course, if you travel, it will vary because of your changing altitude. The altimeter is excellent for charting changes in elevation as you point out in your review, but it needs setting to your current altitude before heading out. If the barometric pressure changes because the weather changes, it will be less accurate. Even though I already have an analog Pro Trek, I feel I want this one as well!
Guest
how much is reviewers wrist size?
Guest
Excellent review – as always! Just a question; does this watch have the sunrise/sunset data? i have the protrek 1500 and want the extra functionality…
Mail It
No, only the 2000 has it.
Jeremy
No, it doesn’t. Check the 2000 model if you want that instead of lunar/tide info.
Rich
Love the Pro-Trek series. i swear these watches will just go on and on and on (so tough and robust.) Have to admit i never actually used mine for the purpose it was designed for though! Love the layout of this review and the hi-res pics.
Micheal Ballack
The Watch now a days not just a time piece but it is know for its functionality. when i was searching for my watch i came across the site call infibeam.com where there is a good collection of watches.
Buoy
hi there – great review! James, I’d also like to ask; does this watch have sunrise/sunset data? Then this would be the ultimate watch – a tool for every occasion!
Jeremy
No, check the 2000 model if you can give up the lunar/tide data for the sunrise/sunset data.
a.k.a. 老丹
Great review. Good watch, but seems to be too big, not for my wrist, sadly.
Jeremy
This was my first thought, Daniel, but I’ve been pleasantly surprised by Casio. My first G-Shock (GW5600) had that formed strap and it fit well. Then, the Twin Sensor I bought last year was even wider, and it also fit fine. Lastly, the WVA470 I just received is the only watch with a 42mm case diameter that would actually fit my 6-7/8″ wrist. The key is in the molded curved spots at the lugs of the case, on the bottom.
LF
You state this watch has a Titanium case. Are you sure? I have found several claims that the case in resin, not Titanium. The Casio web site for this watch says Titanium band, but does not say the case is also. Could you please verify weather the case is Titanium or resin? Thanks.
James Stacey
You are correct, the case is resin and not titanium. Thanks for the note, I have corrected the post.
AndyH
James your review of this watch on YouTube was excellent and appreciate the thorough yet easy to understand communication style and messaging for all the features incorporated in this watch.
Randy S
great article, I just picked up the 2000t at a great price but the 2500 is very cool. I can use the sunrise sunset data better then the tide graph, too bad they dont add both,,
Jimmyzig
If you want sunrise/sunset data, look into a Yes watch
randy S
I’m liking the 2500 more and more…its growing on me 🙂
opavo
Nice Collection.. Never seen before, such designs, Thanks for sharing.
Lespaul
hi …just bought the prg 2500 a week ago after watching your review on youtube..here its known as prg 250t-7dr tho….luv it..bought it for us 275 dollar …but couldnt utilise the atomic thing tho.lol..how much is it in the us?…regards from malaysia and thanks for the review
James Stacey
The list price is roughly $400 but I am not sure what the street/online price is. Thanks for checking out the review!
Rally2xs
Paid $400 at Fashion Time in the Potomac Mills Mall in Woodbridge, Va. on Friday. Still reading and attempting to understand the instructions. Freakin’ think is way feature-rich. I may never master the altitude savings and recall, and tidal info, as I figure to probably not need ’em… no boat, and don’t climb. But otherwise, wow, what an instrument to be able to wear on a wrist.
Les7paul7
Just to be clear…if i were to visit any country with atomic signals…the prg 250t wont work?,,thanks in advance
Nakedsv
Correct. It is not that it “doesn’t work” it is that the watch doesn’t include that feature. That’s why yours is a 250 instead of a 2500. The extra 0 and extra cost gets you the atomic synchronization. However, take comfort in the fact that the watch’s quartz movement is accurate to +/-15 s per month, and is probably even more accurate than that in practice.
Xid
prg-250 does not have atomic timing
JimmyZig
$380 through a retailer on Amazon (fulfilled by Amazon)
AndyH
Received through ShopNBC for $287 and love this watch!
Franklin Darwin
I recently purchased the pro tek 2500t and I am tremendously pleased. This is my 7th casio in the triple
sensor, solar models. I got the titanium bracelet and titanium case. Anything plastic or resin takes too
much wear and tear. Overseas they make these with different crystals and here in America with different
bracelet materials, I prefer the titanium model. In fact I would like the bezel to be titanium.
Overall I rate the watch as exceptional and especially for the price. And approximately $400 USD, no other
watch compares in functionality, cost and quality. I’d recommend it to any outdoor/sport enthuasists.
Lovelandimages
Good review! I really liked your comment about the Jeep Wrangler as I own one and your “right on the mark.” I’ve climbed 52 of the 14,000 ft. Peaks here in Colorado and wished I had this watch during those climbs. I could see where the data that this watch could show would have helped in in the numerous decisions that one makes in an assent and decent of a mountain with the varying weather, poorly marked trails, having a touch of altitude sickness, seeing the ridge line above you is the “true summit” and not another “false summit” and not having the adjoining topo of which your route crossed onto(the topos don’t adjust for a mountain’s location).
I did these climbs with a topo and a compass without a GPS. The additional info that this watch presents would help keep the confidence level on the positive side. I’m sure you will agree that one’s confidence level is critical when you place yourself in these situations!
Thanks,
Tom M.
Jake
Does this watch work for diving, and can it use the altimeter read underwater?
Matt
Good review, thank you. Curious why so many watches have barometers and altimeters (if they have one they may as well have both I guess, since they use the same sensor, ). Temperature is not worth the space. Far better to have sunrise, sunset, and moonrise and moon set.
If there is a trade off, lose the barometer but keep the altimeter display, plus the illumination data.
Like, what are you more likely going to want to know as you prepare to head up the mountain or set sail out of port or head into a new port, or plan most any type of operation: when there is going to be some light and when it is going to be dark somewhere and sometime, or would you prefer the current temperature, your altitude, and the barometric pressure?
Of course, there is the issue of what other tools such as GPS or map you may have, but either way it does not change my preference. I have done a bit of all of the above activities, and I know what I prefer hands down. And if you want or need a GPS, just bring one along. Maybe the same for an altimeter.
At the least, watches that have temperature should seriously think about having the sun and moon illumination data instead. The data set is already somewhat there given the moon phases and tide data.
One last thing, I AM a Pathfinder.
Matt
I have a better idea, after taking into accont the atomic clock.
The Pathfinder watches should have sunrise, sunset, moon rise, and moon set illumination data.
Keep the 2500 as it is, except:
The atomic clock feature seems to be least in synch with the concept of these watches.
If a trade off has to be made, the atomic clock should be the first to go in order to have the illumination data.
Next to go would be the thermometer, but the temperature does have a part to play for the weather prediction piece, and some other things.
All the other features are what are needed, but it also needs sunrise, sunset, moon rise, moon set.
sr
Excellent review, very useful detailed information, I just recently purchased the 2500T thinking that the case was titanium as well ( a little disappointed).
The last casio I had was the PAW1200T which survived everything I threw at it. But recently, the sensor cover broke and trying to find parts for the casio is like pulling teeth. I would hate for their repair estimate to be close to the price of the watch.
Wang Xuancong
Great review! But a really good review should not only talk about good aspects.
I would personally suggest/recommend Casio to make their multi-functional watches smaller, thinner and lighter. Indeed, Casio has the world-leading technology in making multi-functional watches. No other brand watches can have all their functions simultaneously (compass, thermometer, barometer, altimeter, etc). But one thing we realize is that all those multi-functional watches are very very big and bulky. Even without triple sensor, standard Casio watches have larger average size compared to other brands, is it due to technology limitation? I’m not very sure. Hope as the technology develops, they can make it smaller in size over time to fit more people. Currently, those huge watches are only suitable for mountain climbers, ordinary people wearing them would feel cumbersome and lousy when moving their hands in daily life. A close inspection of the entire front side of the watch would reveal that >50% of the area is occupied by panels/buttons giving useless information. For example, who does NOT know up is North, down is South, left West and right East; the word ‘Tough Solar’ is kind of showing off, before I buy it, I know it’s solar, if Casio want to show it, engrave it on the back; a familiar user know which button is for what function, Casio may want to print it on the side so that the main LCD display can be made larger for clearer display and more solar power collection.
If Casio can make it smaller, lighter and more durable, they will definitely exceed those top runners like Rolex, Omega. For example, if a Casio Pro Trek 2500T can have a diameter <40mm, thickness 10 years, kinetic battery recharger in addition to solar, I would definitely prefer it than any Rolex/Omega. I’m sure some people will think the other way, but as time goes by, Casio will eventually win out.
Remember, the most elegant device of any kind usually have lightest weight, smallest size, most functions and greatest durability.
Thanks!
Wang Xuancong (w_xc@hotmail.com)
Richard
I recently bought one. It’s temperature sensor is terrible. Firstly its on the top left meaning if, as most do , you wear it on your left wrist then the temperature it’s measuring is “inside the shirt” temperature. Even When I transferred it to the right writs and rolled up my sleeve in -3 degrees it still said it was 12 degrees C!
Frik du Toit
Have you tried calibrating the temperature sensor? Also, in all fairness, I don’t think one can blame the watch for measuring a higher temperature while wearing it – any thermometer would be affected by your body temperature if you tied it to your arm.
Frik du Toit
Hi James, good review. I’m a huge Casio fan, currently wearing a PRG-130 and I’ve just ordered a 2500T. However, I wish Casio would address what I consider a major shortcoming in many of their watches: practically inaudible alarms (and I’m not the only one complaining about this).
Salvador Suarez
Do you know if Casio will add to the 2500t the sunrise and sunset data?
Sarina Valentina
will you mind if I share this on twitter?
KEERTHI
Thanks for the review with stunning images.